Platform Comparison
TypeGlot takes a fundamentally different approach to internationalization. While traditional platforms are powerful cloud services, TypeGlot is a developer-first, Git-native toolchain that keeps everything local.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | TypeGlot | Lokalise | Crowdin | Phrase | Transifex | Weglot | Smartling |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type Safety | ✅ Full TypeScript | ❌ No | ❌ No | ❌ No | ❌ No | ❌ No | ❌ No |
| Git-Native | ✅ Yes | ⚠️ Via sync | ⚠️ Via sync | ⚠️ Via sync | ⚠️ Via sync | ❌ No | ⚠️ Via sync |
| Local-First | ✅ 100% local | ❌ Cloud | ❌ Cloud | ❌ Cloud | ❌ Cloud | ❌ Cloud | ❌ Cloud |
| AI Translation | ✅ Your AI | ✅ Built-in | ✅ Built-in | ✅ Built-in | ✅ Built-in | ✅ Built-in | ✅ Built-in |
| Context Extraction | ✅ JSDoc/TSDoc | ⚠️ Manual | ⚠️ Manual | ⚠️ Limited | ⚠️ Manual | ❌ No | ⚠️ Limited |
| VS Code Integration | ✅ Native | ⚠️ Extension | ⚠️ Extension | ❌ No | ❌ No | ❌ No | ❌ No |
| Pricing | ✅ Free | 💰 $120+/mo | 💰 $50+/mo | 💰 $19+/mo | 💰 $99+/mo | 💰 $29+/mo | 💰 Enterprise |
| Translation Memory | ❌ No | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Collaboration UI | ⚠️ Local only | ✅ Web | ✅ Web | ✅ Web | ✅ Web | ✅ Web | ✅ Web |
| Professional Services | ❌ No | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Workflow Management | ❌ No | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Integrations | ⚠️ Growing | ✅ 50+ | ✅ 500+ | ✅ 100+ | ✅ 60+ | ✅ 20+ | ✅ 40+ |
What TypeGlot Does Best
🔒 True Type Safety
TypeGlot is the only i18n solution that provides compile-time type safety. Every translation key becomes a fully-typed TypeScript function with autocomplete and parameter validation.
// Autocomplete shows all available translations
m.welcome({ name: string }); // ✅ Type-checked at compile time
m.items_count({ count: number }); // ✅ Pluralization rules included📦 Zero Sync Anxiety
Your translations live in your Git repository. No cloud sync means:
- No subscription fees - it's just files in your repo
- No sync conflicts - Git is your source of truth
- No vendor lock-in - standard JSON and TypeScript files
- Works offline - no internet required for development
🤖 Context-Aware AI
TypeGlot uses the AI you already pay for (GitHub Copilot, Claude, ChatGPT) and gives it the context it needs:
/**
* @desc Shown in the checkout flow when user clicks to finalize purchase.
* Should be action-oriented and create urgency.
*/
const button = m.checkout_complete_purchase();The JSDoc comment travels with the key, ensuring AI translators understand the exact context, tone, and usage.
💻 Developer Experience
Built by developers, for developers:
- Watch mode - instant recompilation on changes
- Local UI - manage translations without leaving your workflow
- VS Code integration - inline previews, quick fixes, AI translation in your editor
- CLI-first - automate everything in your CI/CD pipeline
What TypeGlot Doesn't Have (Yet)
We're honest about our limitations:
❌ Translation Memory
TypeGlot doesn't have built-in translation memory or glossaries. We rely on AI models which already have massive linguistic knowledge, but we don't persist learnings across projects.
Our take: For 90% of use cases, modern AI with good context beats traditional TM. For large enterprises with highly specialized terminology, established platforms may be better.
❌ Professional Translation Services
We don't offer human translation services or connect you with professional translators.
Alternative: Use TypeGlot for the technical infrastructure, and hire translators independently to review AI output. Export JSON, send to translators, import back.
❌ Non-Developer Collaboration
Our local UI is great, but it requires running a local server. Non-technical team members can't access a web portal to suggest translations.
Alternative: For small teams where developers handle translations, this is fine. For larger organizations, you might need a hybrid approach.
❌ Extensive Integrations
We don't integrate with Figma, Sketch, marketing automation tools, CMS platforms, etc.
Our take: We're focused on the developer experience. If you need deep integrations with business tools, traditional platforms are more mature.
❌ Advanced Workflow Management
No approval workflows, reviewer assignments, or translation project management features.
Alternative: Use GitHub's PR review system. Translations are code, so use code review workflows.
Who Should Use TypeGlot?
✅ Great Fit
- Startups & small teams - need i18n without monthly fees
- Open source projects - everything in Git, community-friendly
- TypeScript projects - want full type safety
- Developer-led teams - devs handle or oversee translations
- AI enthusiasts - already pay for GitHub Copilot or similar
- Privacy-conscious - no data sent to third-party platforms
⚠️ Maybe Not Ideal
- Large enterprises - need professional translation services and workflow management
- Marketing-heavy orgs - require extensive integrations with business tools
- Non-technical teams - translators need web-based collaboration portals
- Specialized domains - rely heavily on translation memory for technical jargon
The Bottom Line
TypeGlot isn't trying to replace enterprise translation platforms. We're building a better solution for developers who:
- Value type safety and developer experience
- Want to avoid subscription fees and vendor lock-in
- Trust modern AI over legacy translation memory
- Prefer Git-based workflows
If that's you, give TypeGlot a try →